Implementation guide

Start with one live role and a reviewable definition of success

The best first implementation is bounded. Use a real role, a rubric the hiring team agrees with, and a pool whose results the recruiter can independently review.

Choose a role with enough volume to expose the bottleneck

Pick a role where manual first-pass review is taking material time. Keep the interview process and final decision unchanged during the trial.

Agree on the rubric before uploading resumes

Write the criteria in observable terms, set the relative weights, and remove criteria the team would not defend in a real hiring discussion.

Run the pool and inspect the evidence

Upload the files, wait for processing to complete, and sample high, middle, and low-ranked candidates. Compare each rationale with the actual resume before trusting the ordering.

Measure usefulness, not agreement alone

Track time saved, strong candidates surfaced, false positives, false negatives, and criteria that need revision. Export the recruiter-reviewed results only after this validation.

Pressure-test it on one real role

Define the rubric, run the pool, and inspect the reason behind every score before you trust the ranking.

Start the trial